Fatcow Icon
Board picks Jett as county schools’ superintendent
by Cris Ritchie
Editor
<p>photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald</p><p>Then Interim Superintendent Jonathan Jett (at left) conversed with board members James Ritchie and Charlene Miller during the school board's October 2012 meeting.</p>

photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald

Then Interim Superintendent Jonathan Jett (at left) conversed with board members James Ritchie and Charlene Miller during the school board's October 2012 meeting.

slideshow

HAZARD — Eight months ago the Perry County school board tapped Jonathan Jett to head the school district as interim superintendent. On Friday, following a marathon of candidate interviews that lasted well into the evening, he stepped into the position full time.

Jett was one of five candidates the school board interviewed for the superintendent’s job throughout the day on Friday. He was eventually hired on a vote of 3-2, signing a contract to serve as superintendent for the next four years. Board Chairman John C. Combs, along with members Debbie McIntosh and Charlene Miller, voted in favor of the hire, while members James Ritchie and Jerry Stacy voted “no.”

Combs said on Saturday that Jett had performed well in the interim position, and he viewed the board’s decision as the right one for the district.

“I think he’s done a real good job out there,” Combs said. “He’s young and he’s got a good future ahead of him, and he’s got a good head. He stops and thinks about what he does, and he’s a worker.”

A graduate of the former Dilce Combs High School, Jett is a native of Perry County who previously worked as the district’s chief academic officer, and then head of maintenance and transportation. He was named interim superintendent in October 2012, following the abrupt retirement of former Superintendent John Paul Amis.

“I think he’s got a good opportunity to do a good job,” Combs added, “and I expect big things out of him.”

Jett was in a staff meeting Tuesday morning and did not return a call seeking comment before this week’s final deadline.

The school board will be less one member moving forward, however, as James Ritchie tendered his resignation following Jett’s hire on Friday. Ritchie had served on the board for the past five years, and said there were a lot of factors that led to his departure, including what he called “certification issues.”

Two of Jett’s three education certificates were temporary suspended following an investigation into alleged cheating on ACT tests in 2010. Jett was serving at the time as the district’s assessment coordinator and was responsible for testing security. Jett maintained his innocence in the case, but an agreed order issued by the Education Professional Standards Board noted Jett should have been aware some tests appeared to have been altered.

Probationary conditions were placed in the case, including that Jett no longer oversee any testing required by state statute. He was also required, by May 31 of each year, to submit a letter from the board chairman to the Kentucky Education Professionals Standards Board “confirming that he did not participate in or directly supervise the administration of any state mandated testing during the school year,” according to the order. Jett stands to lose certification if he fails to adhere to these conditions.

“I felt like we had much better applicants for the job,” Ritchie said, adding the condition requiring a letter from the board chairman in turn gives the chairman too much power over the superintendent.

Following former Superintendent Amis’s retirement last fall, Ritchie said the district was on the right track in turning itself around in the wake of the ACT allegations and Perry Central’s addition to a state list of persistently low-achieving schools. At present, he said, he doesn’t feel that way.

Ritchie said suggestions he had made during Jett’s tenure as interim superintendent were never followed up on or Jett was non-responsive at the time. He specifically pointed to stiffer drug policies for teachers and students in the district as one example of something he had hoped to accomplish. But ultimately, he added, there were numerous reasons that led to his resignation.

“There were some things that didn’t happen, that I felt like it was time for me to leave,” he said. “I’ll support Perry County the best way that I can. I really hope he turns out to be the best superintendent we have had and our district moves forward, for the sake of our children.”

Board member Jerry Stacy also did not support Jett’s hire, but said now that there is a superintendent working full time at central office, the focus for the board and the district should now be to ensure the best possible learning environment for the students of Perry County.

“What happened, happened, and now we have a superintendent in place and there’s a lot of very important work that’s got to be done for our kids,” Stacy said. “I want to focus on everybody pulling together and getting that work done and maintaining our focus where it needs to be, which is on our kids.”

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Black Gold Festival Recap
1GTB_DSC_0653.JPG
view slideshow (22 images)

  • 08.23.09 - 05:00 pm


News
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
Apple tax dodging highlights need for reform
by Frank Clemente
Jun 18, 2013 | 61 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Talk about taking your business to “the Cloud.” In an ingenious effort to avoid billions of dollars in taxes, Apple, Inc., has been levitating subsidiaries between American and Irish soil, claiming that from a tax-law perspective, they exist in neither country and so are subject to neither country’s taxing authority. And, sadly, the scheme has worked: no taxes have been paid to the U.S., a relatively paltry sum was paid to Ireland.

Though this was Apple’s most audacious tax-dodging scheme, it wasn’t the only one.

Congressional investigators recently found that Apple had avoided paying virtually any taxes on $74 billion in offshore profits over the past four years. That’s a big loss of revenue needed to hire teachers, build roads or pay down debt.

How does Apple manage to skip out on its tax responsibilities on such a massive scale? It shuffles profits generated by American ideas, American workers and American consumers through shell companies in tax havens such as Ireland, where it’s subject to few or no levies. And it’s not alone among corporate giants. According to the Congressional joint tax committee, ending this kind of tax avoidance by big corporations would raise almost $600 billion over the next decade.

But Apple deserves special attention. Admired for its technological prowess and often in contention for the nation’s most valuable company, it’s a leader as well in stashing profits—over $100 billion today—overseas and out of reach of U.S. taxes.

Some might be tempted to praise such aggressive tax strategies. Except that needy kids are being kicked off Head Start, grandmothers are getting fewer Meals on Wheels, and disabled students are being denied special education—all because of ham-handed across-the-board federal budget cuts known as the “sequester.” By cleaning up the whole overseas corporate tax mess we could restore 60 percent of the $1 trillion in sequester cuts scheduled for the next decade.

But Apple and its corporate brethren—backed by their allies in Congress—want to do the opposite. Rather than close corporate tax loopholes, they want to reward corporations with money stashed overseas (Bloomberg estimates a staggering $1.9 trillion) with a temporary tax amnesty, called a “repatriation holiday.” That one-time pass would then be followed by a permanent tax amnesty, known as a “territorial tax system.”

Corporate executives argue that drastically lowering the U.S. taxes charged on “repatriated” cash would encourage companies to make investments and create jobs here. The trouble is we’ve tested that theory already and it failed miserably. When Congress declared a corporate tax holiday of drastically reduced rates on foreign cash in 2005, money came home all right, but instead of job-creating investment, it was mostly used to pad the pockets of wealthy executives and shareholders, according to the Congressional Research Service. Worse, in the years that followed, that first amnesty has actually accelerated the flight of cash overseas as corporations quite reasonably await the next one.

A territorial tax system would end the waiting game by completely eliminating U.S. taxes on overseas profits made by American corporations. This would give a green light to Apple and others to use tax dodges to shift capital to overseas tax havens that assess little or no corporate income tax, draining our treasury, lowering wages and eliminating jobs at home. It also disadvantages purely domestic companies – often small businesses – that play by the rules and pay their fair share.

We need corporate tax reform, but not the type—like repatriation and territoriality—that encourages, rather than reduces, corporate tax dodging. And we don’t need reform that fails to generate any new revenue from Corporate America (which so far has contributed nothing to deficit reduction), and instead uses any increased collections from closing loopholes to reduce tax rates. A recent study by the Economic Policy Institute found that there was no correlation between lower corporate tax rates and economic growth—if anything, the economy did better when corporate rates were higher.

There’s real corporate tax reform legislation in Congress right now that would end offshore tax loopholes and raise $600 billion over 10 years – money to restore battered public services, rev up our economy and pay down debt. This is true corporate tax reform would finally end the accounting magic show and force Apple’s floating subsidiaries back down to earth.

Clemente is executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Read More News
Sports
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
Apple tax dodging highlights need for reform
by Frank Clemente
Jun 18, 2013 | 61 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Talk about taking your business to “the Cloud.” In an ingenious effort to avoid billions of dollars in taxes, Apple, Inc., has been levitating subsidiaries between American and Irish soil, claiming that from a tax-law perspective, they exist in neither country and so are subject to neither country’s taxing authority. And, sadly, the scheme has worked: no taxes have been paid to the U.S., a relatively paltry sum was paid to Ireland.

Though this was Apple’s most audacious tax-dodging scheme, it wasn’t the only one.

Congressional investigators recently found that Apple had avoided paying virtually any taxes on $74 billion in offshore profits over the past four years. That’s a big loss of revenue needed to hire teachers, build roads or pay down debt.

How does Apple manage to skip out on its tax responsibilities on such a massive scale? It shuffles profits generated by American ideas, American workers and American consumers through shell companies in tax havens such as Ireland, where it’s subject to few or no levies. And it’s not alone among corporate giants. According to the Congressional joint tax committee, ending this kind of tax avoidance by big corporations would raise almost $600 billion over the next decade.

But Apple deserves special attention. Admired for its technological prowess and often in contention for the nation’s most valuable company, it’s a leader as well in stashing profits—over $100 billion today—overseas and out of reach of U.S. taxes.

Some might be tempted to praise such aggressive tax strategies. Except that needy kids are being kicked off Head Start, grandmothers are getting fewer Meals on Wheels, and disabled students are being denied special education—all because of ham-handed across-the-board federal budget cuts known as the “sequester.” By cleaning up the whole overseas corporate tax mess we could restore 60 percent of the $1 trillion in sequester cuts scheduled for the next decade.

But Apple and its corporate brethren—backed by their allies in Congress—want to do the opposite. Rather than close corporate tax loopholes, they want to reward corporations with money stashed overseas (Bloomberg estimates a staggering $1.9 trillion) with a temporary tax amnesty, called a “repatriation holiday.” That one-time pass would then be followed by a permanent tax amnesty, known as a “territorial tax system.”

Corporate executives argue that drastically lowering the U.S. taxes charged on “repatriated” cash would encourage companies to make investments and create jobs here. The trouble is we’ve tested that theory already and it failed miserably. When Congress declared a corporate tax holiday of drastically reduced rates on foreign cash in 2005, money came home all right, but instead of job-creating investment, it was mostly used to pad the pockets of wealthy executives and shareholders, according to the Congressional Research Service. Worse, in the years that followed, that first amnesty has actually accelerated the flight of cash overseas as corporations quite reasonably await the next one.

A territorial tax system would end the waiting game by completely eliminating U.S. taxes on overseas profits made by American corporations. This would give a green light to Apple and others to use tax dodges to shift capital to overseas tax havens that assess little or no corporate income tax, draining our treasury, lowering wages and eliminating jobs at home. It also disadvantages purely domestic companies – often small businesses – that play by the rules and pay their fair share.

We need corporate tax reform, but not the type—like repatriation and territoriality—that encourages, rather than reduces, corporate tax dodging. And we don’t need reform that fails to generate any new revenue from Corporate America (which so far has contributed nothing to deficit reduction), and instead uses any increased collections from closing loopholes to reduce tax rates. A recent study by the Economic Policy Institute found that there was no correlation between lower corporate tax rates and economic growth—if anything, the economy did better when corporate rates were higher.

There’s real corporate tax reform legislation in Congress right now that would end offshore tax loopholes and raise $600 billion over 10 years – money to restore battered public services, rev up our economy and pay down debt. This is true corporate tax reform would finally end the accounting magic show and force Apple’s floating subsidiaries back down to earth.

Clemente is executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Read More Sports
Opinion
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
Apple tax dodging highlights need for reform
by Frank Clemente
Jun 18, 2013 | 61 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Talk about taking your business to “the Cloud.” In an ingenious effort to avoid billions of dollars in taxes, Apple, Inc., has been levitating subsidiaries between American and Irish soil, claiming that from a tax-law perspective, they exist in neither country and so are subject to neither country’s taxing authority. And, sadly, the scheme has worked: no taxes have been paid to the U.S., a relatively paltry sum was paid to Ireland.

Though this was Apple’s most audacious tax-dodging scheme, it wasn’t the only one.

Congressional investigators recently found that Apple had avoided paying virtually any taxes on $74 billion in offshore profits over the past four years. That’s a big loss of revenue needed to hire teachers, build roads or pay down debt.

How does Apple manage to skip out on its tax responsibilities on such a massive scale? It shuffles profits generated by American ideas, American workers and American consumers through shell companies in tax havens such as Ireland, where it’s subject to few or no levies. And it’s not alone among corporate giants. According to the Congressional joint tax committee, ending this kind of tax avoidance by big corporations would raise almost $600 billion over the next decade.

But Apple deserves special attention. Admired for its technological prowess and often in contention for the nation’s most valuable company, it’s a leader as well in stashing profits—over $100 billion today—overseas and out of reach of U.S. taxes.

Some might be tempted to praise such aggressive tax strategies. Except that needy kids are being kicked off Head Start, grandmothers are getting fewer Meals on Wheels, and disabled students are being denied special education—all because of ham-handed across-the-board federal budget cuts known as the “sequester.” By cleaning up the whole overseas corporate tax mess we could restore 60 percent of the $1 trillion in sequester cuts scheduled for the next decade.

But Apple and its corporate brethren—backed by their allies in Congress—want to do the opposite. Rather than close corporate tax loopholes, they want to reward corporations with money stashed overseas (Bloomberg estimates a staggering $1.9 trillion) with a temporary tax amnesty, called a “repatriation holiday.” That one-time pass would then be followed by a permanent tax amnesty, known as a “territorial tax system.”

Corporate executives argue that drastically lowering the U.S. taxes charged on “repatriated” cash would encourage companies to make investments and create jobs here. The trouble is we’ve tested that theory already and it failed miserably. When Congress declared a corporate tax holiday of drastically reduced rates on foreign cash in 2005, money came home all right, but instead of job-creating investment, it was mostly used to pad the pockets of wealthy executives and shareholders, according to the Congressional Research Service. Worse, in the years that followed, that first amnesty has actually accelerated the flight of cash overseas as corporations quite reasonably await the next one.

A territorial tax system would end the waiting game by completely eliminating U.S. taxes on overseas profits made by American corporations. This would give a green light to Apple and others to use tax dodges to shift capital to overseas tax havens that assess little or no corporate income tax, draining our treasury, lowering wages and eliminating jobs at home. It also disadvantages purely domestic companies – often small businesses – that play by the rules and pay their fair share.

We need corporate tax reform, but not the type—like repatriation and territoriality—that encourages, rather than reduces, corporate tax dodging. And we don’t need reform that fails to generate any new revenue from Corporate America (which so far has contributed nothing to deficit reduction), and instead uses any increased collections from closing loopholes to reduce tax rates. A recent study by the Economic Policy Institute found that there was no correlation between lower corporate tax rates and economic growth—if anything, the economy did better when corporate rates were higher.

There’s real corporate tax reform legislation in Congress right now that would end offshore tax loopholes and raise $600 billion over 10 years – money to restore battered public services, rev up our economy and pay down debt. This is true corporate tax reform would finally end the accounting magic show and force Apple’s floating subsidiaries back down to earth.

Clemente is executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Read More Opinion
Latest Video
Weather
Sponsored By:

RSS Feeds
All articles feed
News feed
Sports feed
Videos feed
Obituaries feed
Opinion feed
Local Features
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
Apple tax dodging highlights need for reform
by Frank Clemente
Jun 18, 2013 | 61 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Talk about taking your business to “the Cloud.” In an ingenious effort to avoid billions of dollars in taxes, Apple, Inc., has been levitating subsidiaries between American and Irish soil, claiming that from a tax-law perspective, they exist in neither country and so are subject to neither country’s taxing authority. And, sadly, the scheme has worked: no taxes have been paid to the U.S., a relatively paltry sum was paid to Ireland.

Though this was Apple’s most audacious tax-dodging scheme, it wasn’t the only one.

Congressional investigators recently found that Apple had avoided paying virtually any taxes on $74 billion in offshore profits over the past four years. That’s a big loss of revenue needed to hire teachers, build roads or pay down debt.

How does Apple manage to skip out on its tax responsibilities on such a massive scale? It shuffles profits generated by American ideas, American workers and American consumers through shell companies in tax havens such as Ireland, where it’s subject to few or no levies. And it’s not alone among corporate giants. According to the Congressional joint tax committee, ending this kind of tax avoidance by big corporations would raise almost $600 billion over the next decade.

But Apple deserves special attention. Admired for its technological prowess and often in contention for the nation’s most valuable company, it’s a leader as well in stashing profits—over $100 billion today—overseas and out of reach of U.S. taxes.

Some might be tempted to praise such aggressive tax strategies. Except that needy kids are being kicked off Head Start, grandmothers are getting fewer Meals on Wheels, and disabled students are being denied special education—all because of ham-handed across-the-board federal budget cuts known as the “sequester.” By cleaning up the whole overseas corporate tax mess we could restore 60 percent of the $1 trillion in sequester cuts scheduled for the next decade.

But Apple and its corporate brethren—backed by their allies in Congress—want to do the opposite. Rather than close corporate tax loopholes, they want to reward corporations with money stashed overseas (Bloomberg estimates a staggering $1.9 trillion) with a temporary tax amnesty, called a “repatriation holiday.” That one-time pass would then be followed by a permanent tax amnesty, known as a “territorial tax system.”

Corporate executives argue that drastically lowering the U.S. taxes charged on “repatriated” cash would encourage companies to make investments and create jobs here. The trouble is we’ve tested that theory already and it failed miserably. When Congress declared a corporate tax holiday of drastically reduced rates on foreign cash in 2005, money came home all right, but instead of job-creating investment, it was mostly used to pad the pockets of wealthy executives and shareholders, according to the Congressional Research Service. Worse, in the years that followed, that first amnesty has actually accelerated the flight of cash overseas as corporations quite reasonably await the next one.

A territorial tax system would end the waiting game by completely eliminating U.S. taxes on overseas profits made by American corporations. This would give a green light to Apple and others to use tax dodges to shift capital to overseas tax havens that assess little or no corporate income tax, draining our treasury, lowering wages and eliminating jobs at home. It also disadvantages purely domestic companies – often small businesses – that play by the rules and pay their fair share.

We need corporate tax reform, but not the type—like repatriation and territoriality—that encourages, rather than reduces, corporate tax dodging. And we don’t need reform that fails to generate any new revenue from Corporate America (which so far has contributed nothing to deficit reduction), and instead uses any increased collections from closing loopholes to reduce tax rates. A recent study by the Economic Policy Institute found that there was no correlation between lower corporate tax rates and economic growth—if anything, the economy did better when corporate rates were higher.

There’s real corporate tax reform legislation in Congress right now that would end offshore tax loopholes and raise $600 billion over 10 years – money to restore battered public services, rev up our economy and pay down debt. This is true corporate tax reform would finally end the accounting magic show and force Apple’s floating subsidiaries back down to earth.

Clemente is executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Read More Local Features
Poll
Sponsored By:

Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
Apple tax dodging highlights need for reform
by Frank Clemente
Jun 18, 2013 | 61 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Talk about taking your business to “the Cloud.” In an ingenious effort to avoid billions of dollars in taxes, Apple, Inc., has been levitating subsidiaries between American and Irish soil, claiming that from a tax-law perspective, they exist in neither country and so are subject to neither country’s taxing authority. And, sadly, the scheme has worked: no taxes have been paid to the U.S., a relatively paltry sum was paid to Ireland.

Though this was Apple’s most audacious tax-dodging scheme, it wasn’t the only one.

Congressional investigators recently found that Apple had avoided paying virtually any taxes on $74 billion in offshore profits over the past four years. That’s a big loss of revenue needed to hire teachers, build roads or pay down debt.

How does Apple manage to skip out on its tax responsibilities on such a massive scale? It shuffles profits generated by American ideas, American workers and American consumers through shell companies in tax havens such as Ireland, where it’s subject to few or no levies. And it’s not alone among corporate giants. According to the Congressional joint tax committee, ending this kind of tax avoidance by big corporations would raise almost $600 billion over the next decade.

But Apple deserves special attention. Admired for its technological prowess and often in contention for the nation’s most valuable company, it’s a leader as well in stashing profits—over $100 billion today—overseas and out of reach of U.S. taxes.

Some might be tempted to praise such aggressive tax strategies. Except that needy kids are being kicked off Head Start, grandmothers are getting fewer Meals on Wheels, and disabled students are being denied special education—all because of ham-handed across-the-board federal budget cuts known as the “sequester.” By cleaning up the whole overseas corporate tax mess we could restore 60 percent of the $1 trillion in sequester cuts scheduled for the next decade.

But Apple and its corporate brethren—backed by their allies in Congress—want to do the opposite. Rather than close corporate tax loopholes, they want to reward corporations with money stashed overseas (Bloomberg estimates a staggering $1.9 trillion) with a temporary tax amnesty, called a “repatriation holiday.” That one-time pass would then be followed by a permanent tax amnesty, known as a “territorial tax system.”

Corporate executives argue that drastically lowering the U.S. taxes charged on “repatriated” cash would encourage companies to make investments and create jobs here. The trouble is we’ve tested that theory already and it failed miserably. When Congress declared a corporate tax holiday of drastically reduced rates on foreign cash in 2005, money came home all right, but instead of job-creating investment, it was mostly used to pad the pockets of wealthy executives and shareholders, according to the Congressional Research Service. Worse, in the years that followed, that first amnesty has actually accelerated the flight of cash overseas as corporations quite reasonably await the next one.

A territorial tax system would end the waiting game by completely eliminating U.S. taxes on overseas profits made by American corporations. This would give a green light to Apple and others to use tax dodges to shift capital to overseas tax havens that assess little or no corporate income tax, draining our treasury, lowering wages and eliminating jobs at home. It also disadvantages purely domestic companies – often small businesses – that play by the rules and pay their fair share.

We need corporate tax reform, but not the type—like repatriation and territoriality—that encourages, rather than reduces, corporate tax dodging. And we don’t need reform that fails to generate any new revenue from Corporate America (which so far has contributed nothing to deficit reduction), and instead uses any increased collections from closing loopholes to reduce tax rates. A recent study by the Economic Policy Institute found that there was no correlation between lower corporate tax rates and economic growth—if anything, the economy did better when corporate rates were higher.

There’s real corporate tax reform legislation in Congress right now that would end offshore tax loopholes and raise $600 billion over 10 years – money to restore battered public services, rev up our economy and pay down debt. This is true corporate tax reform would finally end the accounting magic show and force Apple’s floating subsidiaries back down to earth.

Clemente is executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
View Previous Polls
Special Sections
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
Apple tax dodging highlights need for reform
by Frank Clemente
Jun 18, 2013 | 61 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Talk about taking your business to “the Cloud.” In an ingenious effort to avoid billions of dollars in taxes, Apple, Inc., has been levitating subsidiaries between American and Irish soil, claiming that from a tax-law perspective, they exist in neither country and so are subject to neither country’s taxing authority. And, sadly, the scheme has worked: no taxes have been paid to the U.S., a relatively paltry sum was paid to Ireland.

Though this was Apple’s most audacious tax-dodging scheme, it wasn’t the only one.

Congressional investigators recently found that Apple had avoided paying virtually any taxes on $74 billion in offshore profits over the past four years. That’s a big loss of revenue needed to hire teachers, build roads or pay down debt.

How does Apple manage to skip out on its tax responsibilities on such a massive scale? It shuffles profits generated by American ideas, American workers and American consumers through shell companies in tax havens such as Ireland, where it’s subject to few or no levies. And it’s not alone among corporate giants. According to the Congressional joint tax committee, ending this kind of tax avoidance by big corporations would raise almost $600 billion over the next decade.

But Apple deserves special attention. Admired for its technological prowess and often in contention for the nation’s most valuable company, it’s a leader as well in stashing profits—over $100 billion today—overseas and out of reach of U.S. taxes.

Some might be tempted to praise such aggressive tax strategies. Except that needy kids are being kicked off Head Start, grandmothers are getting fewer Meals on Wheels, and disabled students are being denied special education—all because of ham-handed across-the-board federal budget cuts known as the “sequester.” By cleaning up the whole overseas corporate tax mess we could restore 60 percent of the $1 trillion in sequester cuts scheduled for the next decade.

But Apple and its corporate brethren—backed by their allies in Congress—want to do the opposite. Rather than close corporate tax loopholes, they want to reward corporations with money stashed overseas (Bloomberg estimates a staggering $1.9 trillion) with a temporary tax amnesty, called a “repatriation holiday.” That one-time pass would then be followed by a permanent tax amnesty, known as a “territorial tax system.”

Corporate executives argue that drastically lowering the U.S. taxes charged on “repatriated” cash would encourage companies to make investments and create jobs here. The trouble is we’ve tested that theory already and it failed miserably. When Congress declared a corporate tax holiday of drastically reduced rates on foreign cash in 2005, money came home all right, but instead of job-creating investment, it was mostly used to pad the pockets of wealthy executives and shareholders, according to the Congressional Research Service. Worse, in the years that followed, that first amnesty has actually accelerated the flight of cash overseas as corporations quite reasonably await the next one.

A territorial tax system would end the waiting game by completely eliminating U.S. taxes on overseas profits made by American corporations. This would give a green light to Apple and others to use tax dodges to shift capital to overseas tax havens that assess little or no corporate income tax, draining our treasury, lowering wages and eliminating jobs at home. It also disadvantages purely domestic companies – often small businesses – that play by the rules and pay their fair share.

We need corporate tax reform, but not the type—like repatriation and territoriality—that encourages, rather than reduces, corporate tax dodging. And we don’t need reform that fails to generate any new revenue from Corporate America (which so far has contributed nothing to deficit reduction), and instead uses any increased collections from closing loopholes to reduce tax rates. A recent study by the Economic Policy Institute found that there was no correlation between lower corporate tax rates and economic growth—if anything, the economy did better when corporate rates were higher.

There’s real corporate tax reform legislation in Congress right now that would end offshore tax loopholes and raise $600 billion over 10 years – money to restore battered public services, rev up our economy and pay down debt. This is true corporate tax reform would finally end the accounting magic show and force Apple’s floating subsidiaries back down to earth.

Clemente is executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Clifton Watts, a member of the Church of Christ in Brownsfork, used a garden hose to spray mud from the church's front stoop Tuesday afternoon. The church was damaged Monday night during a flash flood. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
Big Creek resident Pleas Spicer speaks with WYMT's Erika Glover Tuesday morning after flood waters washed two vehicles against a bridge the previous night. (photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald)
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
photo by Cris Ritchie | Hazard Herald
slideshow
Apple tax dodging highlights need for reform
by Frank Clemente
Jun 18, 2013 | 61 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Talk about taking your business to “the Cloud.” In an ingenious effort to avoid billions of dollars in taxes, Apple, Inc., has been levitating subsidiaries between American and Irish soil, claiming that from a tax-law perspective, they exist in neither country and so are subject to neither country’s taxing authority. And, sadly, the scheme has worked: no taxes have been paid to the U.S., a relatively paltry sum was paid to Ireland.

Though this was Apple’s most audacious tax-dodging scheme, it wasn’t the only one.

Congressional investigators recently found that Apple had avoided paying virtually any taxes on $74 billion in offshore profits over the past four years. That’s a big loss of revenue needed to hire teachers, build roads or pay down debt.

How does Apple manage to skip out on its tax responsibilities on such a massive scale? It shuffles profits generated by American ideas, American workers and American consumers through shell companies in tax havens such as Ireland, where it’s subject to few or no levies. And it’s not alone among corporate giants. According to the Congressional joint tax committee, ending this kind of tax avoidance by big corporations would raise almost $600 billion over the next decade.

But Apple deserves special attention. Admired for its technological prowess and often in contention for the nation’s most valuable company, it’s a leader as well in stashing profits—over $100 billion today—overseas and out of reach of U.S. taxes.

Some might be tempted to praise such aggressive tax strategies. Except that needy kids are being kicked off Head Start, grandmothers are getting fewer Meals on Wheels, and disabled students are being denied special education—all because of ham-handed across-the-board federal budget cuts known as the “sequester.” By cleaning up the whole overseas corporate tax mess we could restore 60 percent of the $1 trillion in sequester cuts scheduled for the next decade.

But Apple and its corporate brethren—backed by their allies in Congress—want to do the opposite. Rather than close corporate tax loopholes, they want to reward corporations with money stashed overseas (Bloomberg estimates a staggering $1.9 trillion) with a temporary tax amnesty, called a “repatriation holiday.” That one-time pass would then be followed by a permanent tax amnesty, known as a “territorial tax system.”

Corporate executives argue that drastically lowering the U.S. taxes charged on “repatriated” cash would encourage companies to make investments and create jobs here. The trouble is we’ve tested that theory already and it failed miserably. When Congress declared a corporate tax holiday of drastically reduced rates on foreign cash in 2005, money came home all right, but instead of job-creating investment, it was mostly used to pad the pockets of wealthy executives and shareholders, according to the Congressional Research Service. Worse, in the years that followed, that first amnesty has actually accelerated the flight of cash overseas as corporations quite reasonably await the next one.

A territorial tax system would end the waiting game by completely eliminating U.S. taxes on overseas profits made by American corporations. This would give a green light to Apple and others to use tax dodges to shift capital to overseas tax havens that assess little or no corporate income tax, draining our treasury, lowering wages and eliminating jobs at home. It also disadvantages purely domestic companies – often small businesses – that play by the rules and pay their fair share.

We need corporate tax reform, but not the type—like repatriation and territoriality—that encourages, rather than reduces, corporate tax dodging. And we don’t need reform that fails to generate any new revenue from Corporate America (which so far has contributed nothing to deficit reduction), and instead uses any increased collections from closing loopholes to reduce tax rates. A recent study by the Economic Policy Institute found that there was no correlation between lower corporate tax rates and economic growth—if anything, the economy did better when corporate rates were higher.

There’s real corporate tax reform legislation in Congress right now that would end offshore tax loopholes and raise $600 billion over 10 years – money to restore battered public services, rev up our economy and pay down debt. This is true corporate tax reform would finally end the accounting magic show and force Apple’s floating subsidiaries back down to earth.

Clemente is executive director of Americans for Tax Fairness.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet